Im sure Bob lives for updating the vb test forum Every weekend, Bob gets to do another upgrade Bob, 5.1.3 alpha is out Full list of the update
I was about to give some credit for this "bug fix". http://tracker.vbulletin.com/browse/VBV-12550 But at the bottom there is a comment from QA that says they have no servers with PHP5.6 to test on. Ok, it is still beta. But let's hope they put in some decent testing time in on PHP5.6 before the gold release. Bob, what version PHP does your server have? Scott
5.1.3 originally had removing a lot of white space listed in the planned release notes That's gone and not listed in the planned 5.1.4 release either
Good to see that they are addressing the amount of queries required to render a page, however small the reductions are good. Good to see that some aesthetic changes are taking place too.
I have 5.5.12 now. I plan to do a test of 5.6 so I think I'll do it for the test site. It's real simple to change php versions on the fly with IIS.
Cool that 1 man and his forum can do the test but 1 company and it's tech team can not nice one AWS way to show up VB
Was this the version before 5.1.3. Alpha. As have you read this. I know Mark.B test forum is running that exploited version at the minute http://news.softpedia.com/news/vBulletin-Exploitable-Through-SQL-Injection-450894.shtml
Looks like that vulnerability could not have come at a better time if you have been following a thread on vb org http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showpost.php?p=2507155&postcount=67 And they still say the hook system was removed because it made vb vulnerable to hacking
A big giveaway to how vB is going is the replies made to the official announcement thread of the release of this upgrade .. Since Monday, the day of the announcement there have been 11 posts, 5 made by Staff, 1 made by a Staff in disguise he also made this thread http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/foru...as-anyone-realized-how-awesome-vbulletin-5-is the rest made by 3 other members ..
Have you got any proof that the above linked thread is a member of staff in disguise? Who ever it is, uses an American dictionary, which if true, rules out the likes of Mark and Paul
I would also not determine that person to be staff in disguise. It is just someone who doesn't really use the software properly yet. Scott